Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.

Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.

Peter Green / Dec 13, 2019

Alexander of Macedon B C Until recently popular biographers and most scholars viewed Alexander the Great as a genius with a plan a romantic figure pursuing his vision of a united world His dream was at times characterized a

  • Title: Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.
  • Author: Peter Green
  • ISBN: 9780520071667
  • Page: 362
  • Format: Paperback
  • Until recently, popular biographers and most scholars viewed Alexander the Great as a genius with a plan, a romantic figure pursuing his vision of a united world His dream was at times characterized as a benevolent interest in the brotherhood of man, sometimes as a brute interest in the exercise of power Green, a Cambridge trained classicist who is also a novelist, portrUntil recently, popular biographers and most scholars viewed Alexander the Great as a genius with a plan, a romantic figure pursuing his vision of a united world His dream was at times characterized as a benevolent interest in the brotherhood of man, sometimes as a brute interest in the exercise of power Green, a Cambridge trained classicist who is also a novelist, portrays Alexander as both a complex personality and a single minded general, a man capable of such diverse expediencies as patricide or the massacre of civilians Green describes his Alexander as not only the most brilliant and ambitious field commander in history, but also supremely indifferent to all those administrative excellences and idealistic yearnings foisted upon him by later generations, especially those who found the conqueror, tout court, a little hard upon their liberal sensibilities This biography begins not with one of the universally known incidents of Alexander s life, but with an account of his father, Philip of Macedonia, whose many territoried empire was the first on the continent of Europe to have an effectively centralized government and military What Philip and Macedonia had to offer, Alexander made his own, but Philip and Macedonia also made Alexander form an important context for understanding Alexander himself Yet his origins and training do not fully explain the man After he was named hegemon of the Hellenic League, many philosophers came to congratulate Alexander, but one was conspicuous by his absence Diogenes the Cynic, an ascetic who lived in a clay tub Piqued and curious, Alexander himself visited the philosopher, who, when asked if there was anything Alexander could do for him, made the famous reply, Don t stand between me and the sun Alexander s courtiers jeered, but Alexander silenced them If I were not Alexander, I would be Diogenes This remark was as unexpected in Alexander as it would be in a modern leader.For the general reader, the book, redolent with gritty details and fully aware of Alexander s darker side, offers a gripping tale of Alexander s career Full backnotes, fourteen maps, and chronological and genealogical tables serve readers with specialized interests.

    • Best Download [Peter Green] ✓ Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C. || [Fiction Book] PDF ê
      362 Peter Green
    • thumbnail Title: Best Download [Peter Green] ✓ Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C. || [Fiction Book] PDF ê
      Posted by:Peter Green
      Published :2019-09-16T07:34:35+00:00

    About "Peter Green"

      • Peter Green

        There is than one author by this name in the database This is Peter Green.Peter Morris Green born 22 December 1924 is a British classical scholar noted for his works on the Greco Persian Wars, Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Age of ancient history, generally regarded as spanning the era from the death of Alexander in 323 BC up to either the date of the Battle of Actium or the death of Augustus in 14 AD Green s most famous books are Alexander of Macedon, a historical biography first issued in 1970, then in a revised and expanded edition in 1974, which was first published in the United States in 1991 his Alexander to Actium, a general account of the Hellenistic Age, and other works He is the author of a translation of the Satires of the Roman poet Juvenal, now in its third edition.In the Second World War he served in Burma and afterwards studied classics at Cambridge University After working as a journalist and writing historical novels, he taught classics in Athens until 1971, when he became Professor of Classics at the University of Texas at Austin In 1997 he became Emeritus Professor of Classics at Austin He has been Visiting Professor at various universities in the USA.


    1. Alexander being my favorite historical personality, I've read much on him. I highly recommend this book as maybe the best modern biography of the Great one. Alexander was a complex man who realized Greek dreams by conquering the Persian Empire. He never lost a battle and at the time of his untimely death ruled more land than anyone ever had previously, or would again until Genghis Khan if I'm not mistaken. He was intelligent, a great general and soldier, and above all: lucky. Favor of the gods I [...]

    2. I did enjoy this one. Alexander the Great has been the benchmark for all military leaders/conquerors since 300 BC. Romans, Germans, and Huns all wanted to emulate the military prowess of Phillip's son. Alexander with a small army of crack Macedonians defeated the Persian Empire and moved on into India. He subjugated the then known world. His avarice and thirst for conquest knew no bounds. His creation of a strong government to solidify his empire was an afterthought. As soon as Alexander died, h [...]

    3. Peter Green's thesis I'm p. sure: Alexander was a warmongering genius with a embarrassing god-complex, but in a super hot interesting way.

    4. Green's biography of Alexander is erudite and skeptical, with a decidely old-fashioned sensibility. The Alexander that emerges from these pages is history's most gifted military commander and a regicide, a skilled manipulator of men and generous to a fault, a raging alcoholic (even compared to his alcohol-stewed macedonian compatriots) and a man of iron constitution, a world-strider and the progenitor of an empire that evaporated as soon as his heart stilled. More importantly, Green's Alexander [...]

    5. To each culture and to each period in time, Alexander the Great has meant something different, and each generation that recounts his history tends to do so from a different political and social perspective. To the Republic and Empire of Rome he was a noble conqueror; to the Greeks of his time he was a tyrant; to the Indians he was no more than a passing barbarian. To Peter Green (in 1970) he is a man standing upon the shoulders of others, making his own history as he goes, and, like so many abso [...]

    6. The first couple of chapters on Philip were a little disconcerting as the author kept referring to all these inside jokes and historically-nuanced motives and stories I just wasn't familiar with. I felt like he was talking to his professor buddies. After he got that all off his chest, he really settled down into a great, readable story about Alexander's conquests. I really enjoyed this book, which was cool since I don't read a ton of ancient history. My interest is piqued now!

    7. The best of the several biographies of Alexander that I've read. The book succeeds because Green does more than simply know his stuff; he's an elegant writer who does a wonderful job of evoking classical antiquity, and he is particularly strong when describing the world of the near East during that time. He has a novelist's knack for character and place, so the sense you get of the kind of person Alexander was (or his mother and father, Philip and Olympias, for that matter) is always strong and [...]

    8. Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.: A Historical BiographyPeter GreenRead it in old Hard Cover, 617 w/ biblio+apendix+etc.Our final Historic Side Pot of 2014 and what a resounding success. Green gives all of the elaboration of a true historian but is able to retain a lot of the flavor that makes fictitious accounts of the facts of Alexander so interesting. While some Historians summarize culturally, militarily, or politically, Green instead gives more than adequate attention to all of them. Alex [...]

    9. I have a very hard time giving this book a star rating since it is not the kind of book I normally read. I liked it and learned quite a bit so I am going to give it 3 stars. I should point out that the volume of info presented is so vast that I am sure I have only retained a small percentage of it. I might say some things that could be considered spoilerish, but it is history so be forewarned. The reason I read this book is because I wanted to know more about Alexander the Great and now I do! Th [...]

    10. This was such a long and boring book that I almost didn't get through it. UghhI am so happy to be done with it. For one, the author just didn't have a very interesting writing style to allow the reader to get into. The writing was very dry and was just facts, I never felt like I got to know the people at all, and that is what, I think, turns people off from reading about history. If the people in the book aren't personable then readers don't get invested in the characters, and therefore don't ca [...]

    11. This is an overly verbose and boringly written book, which assumes you know quite a bit about Greek and Near Oriental history, but at the same time the analysis is elementary and appropriate for the generally interested but not very knowledgeable public. My feeling is that the author is unaware that he is assuming too much. He is of that generation of Britons who received classical education. Most of us have not had the benefit of that, and are shamefully unschooled in the European classics.The [...]

    12. This was the first Alexander book I ever ventured to read. I came to it after completing two of The Great Courses series: Harl's "Alexander and the Macedonian Empire" and Mclearney's "Alexander and the Hellenistic age". Green brings a distinctive voice to the debate on Alexander's character, leadership and pathos. I found him to be un-romantic in the way he described the king and his exploits (first rate military history rather than swashbuckling, which is good IMHO), and was equally sober in as [...]

    13. Though I love ancient Greek history I'm not a fan of Alexander the Great. However, after reading Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C I became a fan of historian and author Peter Green. While most historians are rather dry, untalented writers, Green records Alexander's story with a great deal of energy and enthusiasm for his subject. I liked the way he analyzed all the tidbits of information we know about Alexander and was able to cut through the years and the propaganda spewed by Alexander's own h [...]

    14. The subject, Alexander, supplies a lot of interesting material, but in the hands of a dry writer even the most amazing history is dull. Green takes this material and writes in a way that elevates it to a history book you just can't put down, which is a rare gem. Some might criticize Green as being a storyteller instead of a historian, but if the history is incredibly boring then no one is going to read it. And Green often does come out and say "these numbers are suspect," or "this is a controver [...]

    15. Knowing very little about Alexander before reading this biography, I found it compelling, fascinating stuff. Peter Green is skilled at taking what seems to be thin and contradictory material and finding a compelling narrative to tell. The battles are well-explained and -diagrammed; the characters are sharply drawn. Alexander's life story - part Patton, part Heart of Darkness - is definitely worth a read.

    16. If you are like me, you need to know where you've been before you know where you are going. History of Greece, the middle east, and India. For anyone who is for/against war should read this book - Give a historical pespective most people need to understand dating back over 2000 years.

    17. By far the best book on Alexander I have read. Portrays Alexander in my opinion as a flawed genius, in many ways this is not his fault however. A very valuable cultural and political analysis of Alexander. Well worth owning and keeping.

    18. This biography had been presented to me as THE biography of reference on Alexander the Great, and I must say, it didn't disappoint. It is obviously the fruits of countless years of research, and an extremely interesting portrayal of the greatest conqueror the world ever knew. Peter Green not only delivers on the military history and the portrayal of battles, explaining the strategy involved quite well (and in a way that wasn't too boring in the eyes of someone who doesn't care about that kind of [...]

    19. Alexander of Macedon was fantastic! The book was very easy to read and I simply could not put it down. I enjoyed all the details of the tactics for Granicus River, Issus, Gaugamella and his other battles. Alexander, the man that Julius Caesar looked up to, weeping at the statue of him and crying that by his age, Alexander had so many accomplishments, and yet what have I (Caesar) done. Alexander was quite an interesting character, getting frustrated with his father (Philip) one night during a wed [...]

    20. Brilliant commander and tyrant Alexander was born from a king and conqueror and raised to be a king and conqueror, but his driving ambition was personal glory, not service to God and Country. He is a type of Antichrist.

    21. Alexander of Macedon by Peter Green is a detailed account on Alexander the Great’s rise to power, and his conquest of the known world. It gives an insight from Alexander’s childhood, with his ego being molded into that of a king, to the Battle of the Granicus, his siege of Tyre, and his manhunt of Darius III. I chose this book because of my interest in Alexander the Great, which was sparked by my 7th grade social studies teacher. The thing I most like about him is that along with his being m [...]

    22. The first time I ever heard of Alexander the great was in middle school. I remember just briefly learning about how he conquered many cities along the Asian Minor. I wasn’t really interested on how really. Or even why? Why was he called Alxander The Great. I mean it could’ve been his last name?! Right? If so where can I get hat last name? just kidding. From reading other reviews about this book It seems as if this is not just your normal biography textbook kind of feel of reading. “Green [...]

    23. As anyone who has been shot can attest, the brief arc of a bullet after the trigger's pull cannot belie its impact. This Alexander—drawn from fragments of evidence, many which were even at the time of record distorted by the needs of empire and ego—moves across the world like a shot. The man was physically durable: in his short life he repeatedly suffered tremendous injury yet continually pushed himself and his army to overcome the world, marking his accomplishments with the same measure use [...]

    24. A skillful historical biography that competently tackles a very challenging if often explored topic: the life of Alexander the Great. The fact is that there are innumerable books on Alexander, both non-fiction and fiction. There is a reason for the multiple fiction. Since Alexander's age was so long ago and because there was so much hero-worship around him, it is very difficult to separate fact from fiction. Peter Green tackles this challenge with the skill and confidence of a master historian. [...]

    25. 1) ''[] Alexander used to complain to his friends that his father was anticipating him in everything---'And for me,' he said, 'he will leave no great or brilliant achievement to be displayed to the world with your aid.' 'But,' his friends objected, 'he is acquiring all this for you.' Alexander replied: 'What use are possessions to me if I achieve nothing?'''2) ''Every individual biographer, myself included, inevitably puts as much of himself, his own background and convictions, into that Protean [...]

    26. I enjoyed reading this and learned quite a bit about Alexander of Macedon as a result. One great thing is that I was finishing this book as I was teaching about the Greeks to my high school students, and there were several new things I could share to add some color to my instruction. Given the soursework (and lack therof) it is a wonder that anyone could write a book like this. The author Peter Green does a great job of reminding the reader about the limitations of the sourcework, nd even devote [...]

    27. Excellent treatment of the character of Alexander. Green's scholarship attempts to discard the overly romanticized version of Alexander from historians such as W.W. Tarn. The only objection I have, is like any historian, Green is influenced by the sociopolitics of his day. Yet he readily admits this and asserts that it is nearly impossible for anyone to capture the true essence of such an enigmatic figure, even without the clouding of lost texts, limited sources, and biases of the historians of [...]

    28. There is scarcely a more fascinating character from antiquity than Alexander. The son of a great king, he was tutored by Aristotle and slept with a dagger and a copy of the Iliad under his pillow. He was undefeated in battle, history's greatest conqueror that went on to amass the largest empire of the ancient world to rule as Alexander the Two-Horned, ruler of East and West. His accomplishments and ambition are staggering by any measure. He was the personification of the Greek heroes Achilles an [...]

    29. This book is now one of my fvorite historical biographies. Peter Green undertook the difficult task of painting a historically plausable, if not accurate, picture of Alexander without projecting on him modern ideals and norms. Mr Green did so with fantastic success. I loved the detailed investigation of motives, the delightful prose describing each encounter on the battlefield down to the phalanx regiment or seige machines. To adequately tell the story of Alexander is to bring together a plethor [...]

    Leave a Reply