Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War

Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War

Michael Isikoff David Corn / Nov 12, 2019

Hubris The Inside Story of Spin Scandal and the Selling of the Iraq War March The United States invades Iraq October The world finds out why What was really behind the U S led invasion of Iraq As George W Bush steered the nation to war who spoke the truth and w

  • Title: Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War
  • Author: Michael Isikoff David Corn
  • ISBN: 9780307346810
  • Page: 458
  • Format: Hardcover
  • March 2003 The United States invades Iraq October 2006 The world finds out why What was really behind the U.S led invasion of Iraq As George W Bush steered the nation to war, who spoke the truth and who tried to hide it Hubris takes us behind the scenes at the Bush White House, the CIA, the Pentagon, the State Department, and Congress to answer all the vital quesMarch 2003 The United States invades Iraq October 2006 The world finds out why What was really behind the U.S led invasion of Iraq As George W Bush steered the nation to war, who spoke the truth and who tried to hide it Hubris takes us behind the scenes at the Bush White House, the CIA, the Pentagon, the State Department, and Congress to answer all the vital questions about how the Bush administration came to invade Iraq Filled with new revelations, Hubris is a gripping narrative of intrigue that connects the dots between George W Bush s expletive laden outbursts at Saddam Hussein, the bitter battles between the CIA and the White House, the fights within the intelligence community over Saddam s weapons of mass destruction, the startling influence of an obscure academic on top government officials, the real reason Valerie Plame was outed, and a top reporter s ties to wily Iraqi exiles trying to start a war Written by veteran reporters Michael Isikoff and David Corn, this is the inside story of how President Bush took the nation to war using faulty and fraudulent intelligence It is a news making account of conspiracy, backstabbing, bureaucratic ineptitude, journalistic malfeasance, and, especially, arrogance.

    • Best Read [Michael Isikoff David Corn] ☆ Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War || [Biography Book] PDF ☆
      458 Michael Isikoff David Corn
    • thumbnail Title: Best Read [Michael Isikoff David Corn] ☆ Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War || [Biography Book] PDF ☆
      Posted by:Michael Isikoff David Corn
      Published :2019-08-07T04:11:11+00:00

    About "Michael Isikoff David Corn"

      • Michael Isikoff David Corn

        Michael Isikoff David Corn Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War book, this is one of the most wanted Michael Isikoff David Corn author readers around the world.


    281 Comments

    1. I already have a Working Theory about how the hell we got dragged in to this one. It's controversial! Because - for example - I don't think Bush or Blair lied! Which is one thing everyone says they did. I explained this elsewhere but I'll recycle it here again. The year is 2002, the scene is Somewhere in Washington. The President speaks:Bush : "We need to find out about Iraq - what's Saddam up to? I know, we'll ask the CIA." CIA : "The Prez wants to know about Iran. No! Iraq. Sorry. Okay, I know [...]


    2. There are two basic plot strands here, and they are executed very well: the manipulation of intelligence, and the repeated use of disproven, debunked, and outright fabricated intelligence by the Bush White House to sell the war against Iraq to the American people; and the CIA leak case, which involved a bit of that fabricated and debunked intelligence. What seems clear is that although Iraq either having WMDs or engaging in WMD development programs was the main public rationale for the war, the [...]


    3. Hubris is the best book on how the Bush Administration brought us to war in Iraq. Its also exceptional at describing the intelligence "failure" and the entire sordid Valerie Plame affair. The book is written by Michael Isikoff, the Newsweek reporter who broke the Monica Lewinski scandal, so you understand right away that he has no partisan axe to grind. The book is a very hard look at how Bush had a clear determination to invade Iraq; how they built a case on flimsy evidence, fears, paranoia, an [...]


    4. It's not over yet. The disastrous American invasion of Iraq lingers 13 years later.Enough time has passed for a thorough analysis of the events that led up to the war and here it is. Michael Isikoff dispassionately lays out the entire sorry sequence of events from before 9/11 through the conviction of "Scooter" Libby for the crime done by Karl Rove in blowing the cover of CIA agent Valerie Wilson with the idea of getting even with her husband, Joseph, for destroying the claim that Saddam Hussein [...]


    5. 4.5 stars.A fascinating, detailed and well-researched effort. And yet it's still hard to believe that this actually happened, and not even that long ago! And we're still dealing with the effects today, even as ANOTHER disasterous administration makes it's bid to maintain it's power.


    6. OMG. This is such a painful read! Blow by blow--the story of an incredibly disastrous administration. I actually haven't finished it yet (Chap 17) but the only concillation is that the Patrick Fitzgerald investigation is getting underway and all the assholes are really squirming now. How did these guys (and gals) get re-elected?? How did they escape prison?? Criminals. All.


    7. Excelente 'storytelling' de como Bush y su administración vendió la amenaza de las WMD a EEUU. Intriga política al más alto nivel. Súper interesante!!!


    8. Despite its inflammatory title, this is a solid, detailed account of the manipulation of intelligence and the intelligence process before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq. It is very good on the individual pieces of intelligence, and it goes way in depth on the Plame/Wilson/Niger/yellowcake scandal. The authors hold their judgments through most of the book, although it is clear that they believe (rightly) that key figures of the Bush administration believed that Saddam has weapons and couldn' [...]


    9. This is another book in a long series on the march toward war in Iraq. It is one of the better of these volumes. One key passage lays out the message of this book (page 410): "What had gone wrong? Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Rice and other administration officials had set themselves up by using the most dramatic and forceful rhetoric in persuading the nation that was necessary. They had approached the invasion of Iraq as though it were a political campaign. They pushed aside doubt, they e [...]


    10. I became so angry reading this book. Not that any of this is new information at this point, just that it's so infuriating to read all the details and machinations of how the invasion of Iraq was engineered by the Neo-Cons. So anxious to depose Saddam Husssein, so obsessed with blaming him for all the problems in the world, that they had to invent reasons to take him out. Some top Bush II officials were enthralled with the notion that Saddam might have master-minded the Oklahoma City bombing! GW [...]


    11. Solid reporting and detailed information. Hindsight is 20/20, and the book seems to ignore the difficulty of making decisions in real time without the luxury of hindsight. There seems to be two clear sides of this issue A) Faulty intelligence given to the White House led to an unneeded war.B) The Bush Administration only used intelligence that supported its preconceived decision to invade Iraq.Or a combination of the two. I agree more with the A thinking while the authors strongly argue B and go [...]


    12. A bit tedious, and there's way too much ink spent on the Valerie Plame affair, but still a useful primer on how a majority of the American populace (me included) was duped into supporting the military intervention in Iraq. From the dubious rationale for the invasion (aluminum tubes + yellowcake from Niger = mushroom clouds!) to the early days of the botched occupation, the authors provide staggering detail from government officials and other witnesses that reveal an administration all too gung-h [...]


    13. A strong account of the idiocy which has led us into the Iraq war. It does stay pretty much to the narrative of what the two authower were able to uncover on their own, and doesn't make too many leaps with the evidence into motives. However the evidence they are able to uncover is damning enough. If you are looking for the deeper reasons of "why", there are probably other books which would be of more interest (e.g Greg Palast's work).


    14. This book was informative but at the same time it was depressing. I have never really seen a more appropriate title to a book other than the dictionary. I was upset that people could be so blinded by their own beliefs that rational objective thinking is ignored because it doesn't mesh with what they believe.


    15. This book presents overwhelming evidence that the Bush and Cheney decided to go to war in Iraq a long time ago, even before 9/11, and details exactly how they strong-armed intelligence officials into delivering any scraps that could be distorted into evidence in favor of the predetermined decision to invade. They lied, they covered up their lies, they got away with it, and it is happening again.


    16. Excellent and a must-read about the Bush years. The best source on why the outing of NOC (non official cover) CIA officers is a crime--hence, the outing of Valerie Plane Wilson (ref. movie and book, Fair Game). I wrote a full review earlier but once again "lost it.


    17. I don't care what side of the political aisle one might be in. You have to read this book. Our government lied to us in so many ways it will startle you. We cant allow any administration to have this much control of the entire system. George Bush was technically King for 8 years


    18. Excellent reporting tied together by a compelling narrative. A cautionary account of what can happen when the ruthless and dishonest lead the incurious.


    19. A well researched and ultimately compelling indictment of the Bush 43 rationale for the invasion of Iraq. For those that continue to espouse support for the Iraqi debacle a book like this, with actual details that are pretty hard to refute, is like exposing Count Dracula to sunlight. Isikoff demolishes the WMD rationale for invasion thoroughly; in doing so he brings to light not just "intelligence failures" but the subtle, and not so subtle, pressure on the intelligence community to conform to p [...]


    20. This book was thorough, detailed, and engaging. It's about a topic I felt I already knew well but contained a vast amount of detail that slipped by me in the moment. I thought the back half of the book dragged a bit when it became bogged down in the minutia of the Valerie Wilson saga, but I was glad to know more about that than I had before.


    21. I was an Air Force planner for missions against Iraq. I bought these lies dutifully and was horrified when I discovered that our government could risk the lives of so many for their agendas. This is a great book that opened my eyes.


    22. Our Gang of Four (Bush, Cheney, Rice and Rumsfeld, as well as their little minions) luxuriantly, incessantly lied our way into our war with Iraq. If you lie boldly enough, despite contrary evidence, and with tons of self-righteous arrogance, you will win out. With a little help from your friends, of course. The co-cowardly twins, U.S. Congress and the CIA, as well as media, who did their best Kevin Bacon imitation when fed with scraps of lies, repeating,bent over, "Thank you, sir. May I have ano [...]


    23. Isikoff's and Corn's detailed, and well-researched, book about the lead-up to America's second war on Iraq is heartbreaking, in the sense that so many Americans felt at the time that waging war against Iraq was both non-sensical and immoral, but they just didn't have the counter-intelligence to challenge the Bush administration's assumptions and rhetoric. Now, with this book and 20/20 historical hindsight on their side, those Americans can feel vindicated. In particular, in the last couple chapt [...]


    24. At times I would like to think malfeasance from high office might only be incompetence, but with Bush, "Scooter" Libby, and the gossip-y Dick Armitage it sures looks like incompetent malfeasance: attacks on Ambassador Wilson, faking claims of Iraqi bio-weapon trucks and Hussein yellow cake purchases were hopeless endeavors that that succeeded inspite of themselves. (The Nigerian documents, sold by a wanna-be freelance spy more dishonest than Curveball was so inaccurate it was akin to producing o [...]


    25. First off I'll admit to never being a fan of George W. Bush and after reading this book I'm even more amazed that (1) he was elected twice; and (2) most of his inner circle never went to prison for their part in the Iraq war fiasco.This book makes very clear that Bush was going after Saddam Hussein whether there was any justification for it or not. Dubya, along with his closest advisers (Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, Wolfowicz, et al), came up with the concept that Saddam has weapons of mass destructi [...]


    26. This is a detailed account of the Bush Administration's misuse and abuse of faulty intelligence in support of going to war with Iraq in 2003. The author demonstrates in detail the faulty nature of the "tubes" reportedly purchased by Iraq for use in centrifuges to produce nuclear material, the existence of mobile trailers outfitted to create poisonous toxins, the existence of unmanned aerial vehicles(UAVS) possessed by Iraq to deliver WMD weapons against the United States, the supposed terrorist [...]


    27. Readers of this book probably fall into two main groups. One group is made up of those who are already in agreement with its argument: that the second Bush administration pushed the country into a war based on faulty intelligence that was, itself, based on lies. Further, key members of that administration came into office already determined to invade Iraq. The other group of readers will throw the book aside in disgust because they still believe the invasion of Iraq was a necessary decision. At [...]


    28. An administration that took power with less than a popular majority, fake news, and James Comey - no, not the story of the 2016 presidential election, but rather the tale of the run-up to the Iraq War. One of the better efforts out there about the debacle that focuses on the marketing and spin leading to the conflict rather than the conflict itself.


    29. It's a tedious read, since it gives an almost day-by-day account of five years of history, but if you want enough detail to be able to draw your own conclusions, perhaps there's no other way.This book is fairly critical of the behavior of the Bush Administration, just as Woodward's "Plan of Attack" is fairly forgiving, but there doesn't appear to be any evidence that Bush, or anyone else, outright lied to get us into the war with Iraq. That doesn't mean that he's blameless, because there are oth [...]


    30. This book confirmed everything else I've been reading,and hearing all in one place. I had a hard time with keeping things straight, and only started writing in the margins half way through. I'm going to re-read it, and write in the beginning pages. I want to number how many times the Bush Administration was told there were NO WMD in Iraq. This should be in a seperate "notes" page, entitled, "Number of Times we were lied to, and when" with page numbers and who lied. Also should be included. a bib [...]


    Leave a Reply